| Cyborgs in Film | Chapter 2 1< || >3 |
by Rachel Rein rachel@cinemaspace.berkeley.edu |
Sci-fi cinema is peppered with a large number of constructed beings. There are several types of cyborgs. The predecessors to cyborgs are humans with prosthetic limbs (the line between a human with a prosthesis and a cyborg is indeterminant). These creatures began in literature (ie. Captain Hook) and are quite common in cinema even today (the one-armed man of The Fugitive or Moses Baxter's prosthetic hand in Hardware. Cyborgs can be found as humans resurrected from flesh into machine (such a Robocop) or as machanical beings with a human body (such as Edward Scissorhands or the T-800 Terminator). Beings are often cunstructed to look like humans but are not made out of organic flesh (such as Star Trek's Data and the replicants of Blade Runner. Mechanical beings can become endowed with a personality (Jonny Five of Short Circut). Humans can have their minds altered to become mental robots (Quaid in Total Recall, the towns people in Invasion of the Body Snatchers, Alex in A Clockwork Orange). Human consciousness can be implanted into cyberspace -- where it looses the confines of the body (as seen in The Lawnmower Man, Max Headroom, and Videodrome).
Clearly, there are many types of machanical
beings populating the world of sci-fi. Webster's defines a robot as an automaton, especially a person who
acts or works mechanically and without original thinking. This definition
perfectly describes the Tramp in Charlie Chaplin's Modern Times
(1936). In the film, the Tramp is a factory worker, and Chaplin shows how
the Tramp is a slave to the machines with which he works.
The Tramp's speed in the workplace is dictated by the speed of the
machine. As the conveyor belt races by at an increasing rate, the Tramp
must work faster. The machine does not exist to help him -- it is not
useful technology -- rather he exists to serve the machine. The Tramp
becomes a robot for the machine, loosing his identity as a human.
Eventually, the Tramp gets sucked into the machine, meshed into it's
grears (see image). With this image, Chaplin demonstrates how people
working in factories are literal machines.
In the film, when the Tramp's co-worker gets stuck inside the machine,
the Tramp simply accepts his new position. There is no outcry as we
would expect -- the little effort that is made to get the worker free is
suspended when lunch time arrives. Again, the Tramp behaves as a robot.
He immediately ceases his activities -- namely, freeing his co-worker
from a giant machine -- and begins to eat lunch when the whistle blows.
After much complaining, the Tramp takes notice of his co-worker again.
Assumming that the man must be hungry (and not that he is complaining
because he has been literally immobilized by the forces of
industrialization), the Tramp begins to feed the man (see image).
Chaplin's film is a continual barage of messages. He visually punches us
with images of the Tramp as a robot. During one scene, the lunch whistle
is blown. However, the Tramp cannot stop the repeated motions required by
the machine. He begins to tighten everything (see image). The Tramp
looses his ability to function -- he cannot eat or drink because his arms
keep spasming. He begins to adjust everything in sight, including
the nose of one of his co-workers. Factory work has transformed his very
exisitence. Industrial society undermines human identity in favor of
mass production. This idea is again illustraed in the scene where the
boss introduces the feeding machine. The Tramp is chosen to be the test
subject for the machine. He is submitted to an uncertain technology.
When the machine begins to malfunction, the technicians care about the
mechanical parts, but not the human test subject. The Tramp must sit there
while the machine repeatedly backfires: soiling and injuring him. The
audiences laughter masks the fear that this is the trajectory of the modern
workplace.
Consider Roger Ebert's review of Robocop:
If logic cannot be applied to the situation (in both Robocop and Modern Times), then human thought is removed from the everyday experience of living. Our bodies mirror machines and our minds switch off. In this new age of technology, cyberspace, virtual reality, and multimedia experiences have replaced the factory. Our senses are no longer dulled by the workplace; instead we seek this numbing through our avenues of entertainment. In his essay "The Erotic Ontology of Cyberspace," Michael Heim explores the new function that cyberspace fills, and we can clearly see how cyberspace has taken over the roll that factories once filled:There is a moment early in "RoboCop" when a robot runs amok. It has been programmed to warn a criminal to drop his gun, and then to shoot him if he does not comply. The robot, an ugly and ungainly machine, is wheeled into a board meeting of the company that hopes to make millions by retailing it. A junior executive is chosen to pull a gun on the machine. The warning is issued. The exec drops his gun. The robot repeats the warning, counts to five, and shoots the guy dead.
This is a very funny scene. (Whether it was even funnier before the MPAA Code and Ratings Administration requested trims in it is, I suppose, a moot point.) It is funny in the same way that the assembly line in Chaplin's "Modern Times" is funny - because there is something hilarious about logic applied to a situation where it is not relevant. (#3)
. . . the cyberspace system, which depends on the physical space of bodies for its initial impetus, now seeks to undermine the seperate existence of human bodies that make it dependent and secondary. The ultimate revenge of the information system comes when the system absorbs the very identity of the human personality, absorbing the opacity of the body, grinding the meat into information . . . Information digests even the secret recesses of the caress. (#4)We must see then, that our ultimate fear is of conversion into bits. The new generation of cyborg films serve to remind us that "the computer culture interprets all knowable reality as transmissible information." (#5) We live in a time when we are in danger of being reduced to coded information. Take, for example, DNA testing. The fear is no longer that we will loose ourselves to a machine, rather that we will be reduced to a series of numbers -- our genetic sequence. Consider, also, the Human Genome Project. The project strives to determine the complete nucleotide sequence of human DNA -- to chart the estimated 50,000-100,000 genes within the human genome. [Click here to learn more.]
| Return to Rachel's Room | Return to CinemaS p a c e. | Learn about MOOs |